Schroeder Investments, L.C. v. Edwards
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice LEE,
opinion of the Court:
T1 The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) owns a piece of property used as a detention pond in Provo, on land adjacent to property owned by Schroeder Investments. Schroeder filed a condemnation action, asserting a right to condemn a portion of UDOT's pareel to construct an access road to the development Schroeder planned to build on its property.
12 UDOT moved for summary judgment. It invoked the "more necessary public use" provision of the eminent domain statute, which provides that property "already appropriated to some public use" may not be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Berrett v. Purser & EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
- I.M.L. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- VCS, Inc. v. La Salle Development, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Hughes General Contractors, Inc. v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Graves v. No. E. Services Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.