Legal Opinion

Schroeder Investments, L.C. v. Edwards

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2013No. 20110910PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

T1 The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) owns a piece of property used as a detention pond in Provo, on land adjacent to property owned by Schroeder Investments. Schroeder filed a condemnation action, asserting a right to condemn a portion of UDOT's pareel to construct an access road to the development Schroeder planned to build on its property.

12 UDOT moved for summary judgment. It invoked the "more necessary public use" provision of the eminent domain statute, which provides that property "already appropriated to some public use" may not be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Berrett v. Purser & EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Utah v. Oregon S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. I.M.L. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. VCS, Inc. v. La Salle Development, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hughes General Contractors, Inc. v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Graves v. No. E. Services Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API