Legal Opinion
State v. James
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1978No. 3277PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal granted defendant. In the trial court, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence seized by the State pursuant to a search warrant. After a hearing, the district court entered an order that sustained and denied the motion in part. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Defendant was charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery of a residence in Tatum, New Mexico, and as an accessory to this armed robbery.
A warrant was issued to search a trailer house of defendant. It was based on information obtained from a named informant, Thomas Eugene…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Anthony J. DichiarinteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. SnedekerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.