Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Diagnostek, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-6509PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
This is a shareholder class action suit against Diagnostek, Inc., certain of its directors and officers, (“the Diagnostek defendants”) and Medco Containment Services, Inc., a company which had intended to acquire Diagnostek. Before me is the Diagnostek defendants’ motion to transfer the case to New Mexico, which the plaintiffs do not oppose, and Medco’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. For the following reasons, I will grant the transfer motion after having granted Med-co’s motion to dismiss.
I. Deciding Medco’s Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Armstrong v. McAlpinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- George Semerenko v. Cendant Corp. Walter A. Forbes E. Kirk Shelton Cosmo Corigliano Christopher K. McLeod Ernst & Young LLP George Semerenko, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P. Schoenfeld Asset Management Llc, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cendant Corp. Walter A. Forbes E. Kirk Shelton Cosmo Corigliano Christopher K. McLeod Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- In Re Intelligroup Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- In Re Synchronoss Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Semerenko v. Cendant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Mates v. North American Vaccine, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.