R. C. Bowers Granite Co. v. Drew Daniels Granite Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit, upon a special contract. .Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the March Term, 1911, Washington County, Miles, J., presiding. Judgment, on facts found by the court, for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The case is fully stated in the opiniop.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an action of assumpsit upon a special contract. The trial was by the court with judgment on the facts found in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff argues only its exception to the judgment.
The plaintiff is a corporation engaged at Montpelier in the sale of granite monuments and the defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of granite monuments at Waterbury. In March, 1909, plaintiff placed an order with the defendant for the manufacture of a granite monument and slab of certain specified sizes and design, the same to be ‘ ‘ strictly first class stock and work and free from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taplin & Rowell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- G. R. Bianchi Granite Co. v. Terre Haute Monument Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
- Esty v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Agnostines v. C. F. Fenn & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Temple Brothers v. MunnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924