Legal Opinion

Santos v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 23, 2003No. 14-02-00354-CRPublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Hector Manuel Santos appeals his aggravated-robbery conviction, arguing in four issues that: (1) — (2) the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress in-court and out-of-court identification testimony after police used an impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedure; and (3) — (4) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to prove appellant participated in the robbery. We affirm.

I. Factual And Procedural Background

The complainant, Jose Gonzalez, and about nine other men were socializing in the early morning hours…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Longoria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Harmon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Trent Mason v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Rojas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. McLendon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API