Legal Opinion
Rangel v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 25, 2006No. 2-04-514-CRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
199 S.W.3d 523 (2006)
Rodolfo RANGEL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, State.
No. 2-04-514-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
July 25, 2006.
Stephen R. Bjordammen, Wichita Falls, for Appellant.
Barry L. Macha, Crim. Dist. Atty., Jeff Eaves, Mark Barber, Asst. Crim. Dist. Attys., Wichita Falls, Matthew Paul, State Prosecuting Atty., Lisa C. McMinn, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State of Texas.
PANEL F: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.
OPINION ON THE STATE'S SECOND PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 50, we have…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.