Legal Opinion

Glazener v. . Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE, J., dissenting in part; WALKER, J., concurring in dissent. This was an action brought by E. A. Glazener, Jack Fisher, and C. P. Hogsed, separately, to enforce a laborer's lien, and tried together by consent. Judgment below was entered against Glazener and Fisher, from which they appealed, and in favor of C. P. Hogsed, from which the defendants appealed.

By consent, the court found the facts, which are as follows: The defendant lumber company entered into a contract with Donald Campbell under which he took over the band sawmill and all attachments, the railroad for hauling out logs, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDougall v. . CraponSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Block v. . DowdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Tedder v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Twin City Motor Co. v. Rouzer Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Barbre-Askew Finance, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Rich v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Elk Creek Lumber Co. v. HambyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Graves v. . DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API