In re Caillouet
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
*368ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.
I,PER CURIAM.*
This disciplinary matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Stephen E. Caillouet, following the institution of formal charges by the. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”). The ODC concurred in respondent’s petition, and the disciplinary board recommended the proposed consent discipline be accepted.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The underlying facts of this matter are set forth in detail in In re: Toups, 00-0634 (La.11/28/00), 773 So.2d 709. Essentially, respondent and Louis Toups are Assistant District…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re ToupsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Succession of Tezeno v. OrdinarioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BlairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- In Re: C. Mignonne GriffingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- In re RuffinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- In Re: C. Mignonne GriffingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017