Legal Opinion

In re Caillouet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 9, 2001No. 2001-B-2461PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*368ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

I,PER CURIAM.*

This disciplinary matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Stephen E. Caillouet, following the institution of formal charges by the. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”). The ODC concurred in respondent’s petition, and the disciplinary board recommended the proposed consent discipline be accepted.

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The underlying facts of this matter are set forth in detail in In re: Toups, 00-0634 (La.11/28/00), 773 So.2d 709. Essentially, respondent and Louis Toups are Assistant District…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ToupsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Succession of Tezeno v. OrdinarioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BlairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. In Re: C. Mignonne GriffingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  3. In re RuffinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. In Re: C. Mignonne GriffingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API