Legal Opinion
Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 25, 1985No. CV 81-3262 AWTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER RE CONTEMPT
TASHIMA, District Judge.
After trial, a Judgment and Permanent Injunction was entered against defendant on February 5, 1985 (the “Injunction”). The Injunction permanently enjoined defendant from further infringing the “patent claims in suit,” as that term was defined therein. The Court has been informed by counsel that defendant’s attempts to have the Court of Appeals stay the Injunction pending determination of the appeal have, thus far, been denied. On March 13, 1985, an order amending judgment and permanent injunction (the “Amended Judgment”) was entered on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Owens v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Interdynamics, Inc., and Smiths Industries, Limited v. Firma Wolf, Arend Wolf, and Trans Tech, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- American Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Josam Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986