Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 28, 1992No. CR 92-440PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is an appeal from the appellant’s convictions for aggravated robbery and rape. He received consecutive sentences of sixty years’ imprisonment on each count. Before trial, appellant made a motion to suppress the victim’s in-court identification of the appellant as being tainted by the police photo lineup. After a hearing, the trial judge denied the motion. At trial, appellant also made a directed verdict motion which was denied by the trial judge. Appellant argues on appeal that the victim’s trial identification of him as the rapist was tainted by a suggestive pre-trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Glick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Tosh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Chism v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Laughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API