Legal Opinion
Perkins v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 16, 2009No. Civil Action 4:08cv50PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Objection of the Plaintiff, Laila Rose Perkins, to the Opinion and Order of U.S. Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller of June 4, 2009 pursuant to Rule 72. In his Opinion and Order, Judge Miller determined the following: 1) Dr. Cloud’s testimony shall be excluded for all purposes; 2) Dr. Wardell may testify at trial only to his treatment of Ms. Perkins, and his testimony is not admissible regarding (a) the causation of Perkins’ injuries and (b) the prognosis of future medical costs.
A magistrate judge’s finding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co. v. Nvidia Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Zellars v. Nextech Northeast, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Vir2us, Inc. v. Invincea, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Crimmins v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Fantauzzo v. SperryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.