Legal Opinion
Nasserizafar v. Indiana Department of Transportation
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided June 16, 2014No. 1:13-cv-02045-JMS-TABPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bahram Nasserizafar, proceeding pro se, brings this employment discrimination action against his former employer, Defendant Indiana Department of Transportation (“IN-DOT”). Presently pending before the Court is INDOT’s Partial Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Filing .No. 10.] For the reasons that follow, IN-DOT’s Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
*937I.
Standard of Review
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that a complaint provide the defendant with “fair notice of what the ... claim is and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A-Tek Mechanical, Inc. v. KHW Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- KINDER v. MARION COUNTY PROSECUTER'S OFFICEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025