Rheudasil v. Clower
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
This was an action instituted by Rheudasil to recover damages from Clower for alienation of his wife’s affections. Clower demurred to the one count declaration, as amended, on the ground that this declaration disclosed it to be a fact that the one year statute of limitations barred the action. The two questions presented by Rheudasil’s appeal in error are (1) when did the cause of action arise and (2) which statute of limitations applies.
The declaration, after alleging in some detail the pursuit by Clower of Rheudasil’s wife over a long period of time, then avers that the result was to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Darnell v. McNicholsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Patten v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Broidioi v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Scates v. NaillingTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stone v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Fennell v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Byron Roberts v. John Berry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Stringer v. Bd. of Trustees of Edward W. Sparrow Hosp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Brown v. DunstanTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.