Legal Opinion

HPIL Holding, Inc. v. Haining Zhang

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 30, 2025No. 1:23-cv-12050Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION HPIL HOLDING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-12050 HAINING ZHANG, et al., Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge Defendants. __________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On March 31, 2025, this Court issued an Opinion & Order sua sponte dismissing Plaintiff HPIL Holding, Inc.’s (“HPIL’s”) Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. HPIL Holding, Inc. v. Zhang, No. 1:23-CV-12050,

2025 WL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Answers in Genesis of Kentucky, Inc. v. Creation Ministries International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Teresa Anne Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools, a Michigan School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API