Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hildebrand v. Kegu

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 70PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The notice of appeal states that appeal is being taken from a “judgment” entered on February 18, 1972. There is no judgment in the record, only a transcript indicating that on February 18, 1972, the court orally granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this paternity case.

The first question is whether the pronouncement from the bench was an order or a judgment. The appellant calls it a judgment, and it is true, if the defendant is found to be the father of the child, the determination of the court is referred to in sec. 52.37, Stats., as a judgment. However, a paternity case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Henry S. Cooper, Inc. v. Town of Pleasant PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. German American Bank v. PowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Alsmeyer v. NordenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dumer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ramsthal Advertising Agency v. Energy Miser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Ramsdell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Naus v. Jt. SD No. 1 Sheboygan FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API