Legal Opinion

Farron and Pam Mitchell, and Limcross Ventures v. Thomas Leroy Plummer, Jr.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 12, 2026No. 26-01018Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Sy a FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Pa: □□□ □ = Fi . 4 ae THOMAS LEROY PLUMMER, JR., Case No. 26-10273-T Seren □□ □□ Chapter 7 Debtor. FARRON and PAM MITCHELL, and LIMCROSS VENTURES Plaintiffs, Adv. No. 26-01018-T v. THOMAS LEROY PLUMMER, JR., Defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”),! filed by Thomas Leroy Plummer, Jr. (“Defendant”); and Plaintiffs’ Response and Objection to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed by Plaintiffs Farron and Pam Mitchell and Limcross…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API