Farron and Pam Mitchell, and Limcross Ventures v. Thomas Leroy Plummer, Jr.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Sy a FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Pa: □□□ □ = Fi . 4 ae THOMAS LEROY PLUMMER, JR., Case No. 26-10273-T Seren □□ □□ Chapter 7 Debtor. FARRON and PAM MITCHELL, and LIMCROSS VENTURES Plaintiffs, Adv. No. 26-01018-T v. THOMAS LEROY PLUMMER, JR., Defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”),! filed by Thomas Leroy Plummer, Jr. (“Defendant”); and Plaintiffs’ Response and Objection to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,” filed by Plaintiffs Farron and Pam Mitchell and Limcross…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.