State v. Griffith
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This is a drug trafficking and manufacturing case. The defendant, Gary Griffith (Griffith), initially sought review of two adverse evidentiary rulings. The State then cross-appealed the district court’s grant of Griffith’s motion to dismiss the jury verdicts which found Griffith guilty of manufacturing a controlled substance and manufacturing a controlled substance in the presence of children. Prior to oral argument, Griffith withdrew his appeal and argument was heard solely on the State’s cross-appeal.
I
FACTUAL SUMMARY
The Twin Falls police were called to the Griffith home after…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Messenger v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. O'BRYANIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Loughlin v. Circle a ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- University of Utah Hospital & Medical Center v. BethkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CheathamIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ShanksIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MorganIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. GriffithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.