Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1995No. 21112PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is a drug trafficking and manufacturing case. The defendant, Gary Griffith (Griffith), initially sought review of two adverse evidentiary rulings. The State then cross-appealed the district court’s grant of Griffith’s motion to dismiss the jury verdicts which found Griffith guilty of manufacturing a controlled substance and manufacturing a controlled substance in the presence of children. Prior to oral argument, Griffith withdrew his appeal and argument was heard solely on the State’s cross-appeal.

I

FACTUAL SUMMARY

The Twin Falls police were called to the Griffith home after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messenger v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. O'BRYANIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. O'Loughlin v. Circle a ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. University of Utah Hospital & Medical Center v. BethkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CheathamIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. ShanksIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. MorganIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. GriffithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API