State v. Griffith
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
Gary Wayne Griffith appeals from his judgments of conviction for manufacturing a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(a), and manufacturing a controlled substance where children are present, I.C. § 37-2737A. Griffith argues that because the state did not offer evidence that the marijuana contained tetrahydrocannabinols (THC), there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty. Griffith also claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
The facts leading to Griffith’s arrest and the subsequent proceedings are as follows:
The Twin Falls police were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WhiteleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. KochIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. ClaytonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SaxtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999