Legal Opinion

Harrison Norris, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 25, 2016No. 15-10390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether the district court'erred by denying an evidentiary hearing for Harrison Norris’s motion to vacate, 28 U.-S.C. § 2255, which alleged that his conviction violated the Due Process Clause because his trial judge was biased against him and mentally incompetent. Norris, a black man, was convicted of forcing women, ■ many of whom were white, into prostitution. Judge Jack Camp presided over Norris’s trial and sentenced him to life in prison. We vacated that sentence as an impermissible general sentence. On remand, a different…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. InchDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  2. Harrison Norris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Jewett v. Warden, Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. PACHACUTEC v. CITY OF FORSYTHDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025
  5. Stevens v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API