Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. One Thousand Three Hundred & Forty Dollars
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 12, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On August 12, 1980, Springfield police officers arrested Woodrow Hubbard on drug charges and seized $1,340 from his person. After he was found guilty in the Springfield District Court on a complaint that charged conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute, the Commonwealth brought a petition under G. L. c. 94C, § 47(d). A Probate Court judge, sitting by designation in the Superior Court, ruled that the seized money “was used or was intended for use as specified in G. L. c. 94C, § 47(a)(5), or [was] the proceeds of sales of controlled substances as stated therein,” and ordered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Nine Hundred & Ninety-Two DollarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. One 1972 Chevrolet VanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Zoning Board of Appeals of Greenfield v. Housing Appeals CommitteeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Tisei v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Harrow v. Board of Appeals of PittsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Seven Thousand Two Hundred Forty-six DollarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Gianelli v. Vatco Industries, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- State v. One 1978 Ford VanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987