Legal Opinion

In re Feller

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchreiber, J.

This is a motion to stay arbitration proceedings under a collective bargaining agreement between petitioner and respondents. The basis for the motion is petitioner’s claim that the agreement violates the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, commonly known as the Taft-Hartley Act. (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 151 et. seq.)

*19The notice of the proposed hearing before the impartial chairman states that the arbitration is predicated upon petitioner’s alleged refusal to submit his books, “ for the purpose of checking figures with a view of obtaining payments to' our Sick Benefit and Vacation Holiday…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. In re the Arbitration between Harold Levinsohn Corp. & Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt & Reefer Makers' UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Upholsterers' International Union of North America v. Leathercraft Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API