Legal Opinion

McCooey v. Megill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 11, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Eastwood, J.

The prosecutor in certiorari seeks to have declared void and of no legal effect a complaint charging him with the violation of R. S. 2 :208-8, commonly known as the Disorderly Persons Act, made against him hv one Russell Hurden, chief of police of the Borough of Spring Lake, New Jersey, before the defendant, G. Marvin Megill, Recorder of the Borough of Spring Lake, New Jersey, on July 30th, 1946.

The complaint under attack is based upon the language of R. 8. 2:202-8 which provides as follows:

“Any person who, being under the influence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mowery v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  2. Peer v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HenryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. State v. SalzmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Town of Belleville v. KiernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API