In Re the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between AAACon Auto Transport, Inc. & Teafatiller
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Petitioner AAACon Auto Transport, Inc., seeks an Order to compel arbitration of a controversy with respondents Teafatiller. The relief has been sought by petition to compel arbitration, pursuant to Title 9 U.S.C. § 4, which was served by mail, together with a “notice of motion to compel arbitration”, on respondents who reside in California. The notice of motion herein, served by mail was the only process issued to initiate these proceedings.
Petitioner, a New York corporation, is a motor carrier, duly licensed by the Interstate Commerce Commission, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Victory Transport Incorporated, Owner of the S.S. Hudson v. Comisaria General De Abastecimientos Y Transportes, Voyage Charterer of thes.s. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bernstein Bros. Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Denver & R.G.W.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- In re the Arbitration between Trade & Transport, Inc. & Directorate General of Commerce, SaigonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maine Central Railroad v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. v. Florence NinfoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In the Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Subrogee of Joseph RomagnoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In the Matter of Arbitration Between Maria Victoria Naviera, S.A., Petitioner v. Cementos Del Valle, S.A., and Materiales Los Alpes, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.