Legal Opinion
Beard v. County of Stanislaus
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 12, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00841Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ 13 v. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., ORDER VACATING JULY 13, 2022 15 Defendants. HEARING 16 (ECF Nos. 32, 34, 35) 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s 19 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”)1 to 20 produce documents in response to Plaintiff Beard’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.