Legal Opinion

Coleman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1941No. 43609PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The plaintiff in this case is the trustee of the Wiloil Corporation, a bankrupt, which is referred to in the opinion as the “corporation”. He seeks to obtain a refund of taxes assessed and paid under section 617 of the act of 1932 which, after making provision for the imposition of a tax on gasoline sold by the importer thereof or by a producer of gasoline, provided in part as follows:(c) (2) The term “gasoline” means gasoline, benzol, and any other liquid the chief use of which is as a fuel for the propulsion of motor vehicles, motor boats, or aeroplanes. (47 Stat. 169,267.)

The report of our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Greenwood v. Freight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whelan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Benton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Bishop Buffets, Inc. v. Westroads, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Blackard v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API