Hine v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge
The sole question involved in this suit is whether or not so-called Fishing Eod Kits as sold by plaintiff George Hine *838Products Co. are “fishing rods” within the meaning of Section 3406 (a) of the Internal Bevenue Code which provides in pertinent part as follows:
There shall be imposed on the following articles sold by the manufacturer * * * a tax equivalent to the rate, on the price for which sold, set forth in the following paragraphs:(1) Sporting Goods. * * * fishing rods, creels, reels, and artificial lures, baits, and flies; * * *. (26 U. S. C. 1946 Ed. Sec. 3406.)
Plaintiff’s business,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commerce-Pacific, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Norton Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Norris Dispensers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Grays Harbor Chair & Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.