Legal Opinion

Hine v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1953No. 50145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

The sole question involved in this suit is whether or not so-called Fishing Eod Kits as sold by plaintiff George Hine *838Products Co. are “fishing rods” within the meaning of Section 3406 (a) of the Internal Bevenue Code which provides in pertinent part as follows:

There shall be imposed on the following articles sold by the manufacturer * * * a tax equivalent to the rate, on the price for which sold, set forth in the following paragraphs:(1) Sporting Goods. * * * fishing rods, creels, reels, and artificial lures, baits, and flies; * * *. (26 U. S. C. 1946 Ed. Sec. 3406.)

Plaintiff’s business,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commerce-Pacific, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Norton Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  3. Norris Dispensers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Grays Harbor Chair & Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API