Legal Opinion
People v. Thomas
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert Charles Kohm, J.
Defendant in an omnibus motion seeks dismissal of the *40Grand Jury indictment on two grounds. The first alleges a lack of evidence.
The court has inspected the minutes of the Grand Jury and finds that sufficient legal evidence was adduced to sustain both counts of the indictment and therefore, that branch of the motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of evidence is denied.
The second branch of the motion alleges that the District Attorney failed to notify defense counsel, after inquiry, of his intention to use specific convictions to impeach the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1994