United States v. Farino
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SIFTON, District Judge.
By notice of motion dated November 9, 1979, the Government has applied to have paid into the Treasury to the name and credit of the United States the sum of $15,050. It is not disputed that during the trial of the captioned criminar case those monies were shown to have been either received by an agent of the Internal Revenue Service as part of an effort to bribe him or to have been transmitted by one defendant, Joseph Farino, to another, Joseph LoMonte, for that purpose and thereafter seized by the Government following LoMonte’s arrest.1 The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. Adrian WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doyle v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- State v. KoncheskyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. FarinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980