Wiggins v. State

ALPERT, Judge.

Armed with a search and seizure warrant, police officers conducted a search of an apartment that appellant, Bernard Wiggins, shared with two other persons. The introduction into evidence, at the trial of appellant for murder and other offenses, of various items that were not listed in the warrant and were not satisfactorily shown to have been properly seized under the “plain view” doctrine was one of two bases for reversal of appellant’s convictions for first degree felony murder, robbery with a deadly weapon, and theft. *555Wiggins v. State, 315 Md. 232, 554 A.2d 356 (1989).1 At…