Swindell-Filiaggi v. CSX Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
BAYLSON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This diversity case raises an issue that has divided courts in this District. Plaintiffs have moved to remand this action to state court on the basis of the “forum defendant rule,” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2). The forum defendant rule provides that an action cannot be removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction “if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2) (emphasis added). Defendants argue that this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gentile v. Biogen Idec, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Phillips Construction, LLC v. Daniels Law Firm, PLLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
- Little v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- D.C. v. Abbott Labs. Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Estep v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.