Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shepherd v. Astrab

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2011No. 2011-1232PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, Charles Shepherd, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel a Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas judge to resentence him and to journalize a final, appealable order.

{¶ 2} Shepherd “had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.” Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308, 901 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1. In addition, Shepherd’s sentencing entry “sufficiently included…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Castro v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Castro v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Briseno v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API