Ayers v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1DissentMontgomery, Judge
Each of the above appeals is from a denial of habeas corpus sought by an indigent prisoner. In each case the lower court judgment of denial has been affirmed. In each instance this Court, by a majority opinion,1 without consideration of the merits of the petition for habeas corpus, has held that a petitioner is not entitled to seek habeas corpus unless and until he has demonstrated that the remedy available under RCr 11.42 is inadequate. I respectfully dissent on the ground that such holding constitutes a wrongful suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, in violation of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schroader v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Richardson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Langdon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964