Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ayers v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 10, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentMontgomery, Judge

Each of the above appeals is from a denial of habeas corpus sought by an indigent prisoner. In each case the lower court judgment of denial has been affirmed. In each instance this Court, by a majority opinion,1 without consideration of the merits of the petition for habeas corpus, has held that a petitioner is not entitled to seek habeas corpus unless and until he has demonstrated that the remedy available under RCr 11.42 is inadequate. I respectfully dissent on the ground that such holding constitutes a wrongful suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, in violation of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schroader v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  2. Richardson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  3. Langdon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API