Legal Opinion

People v. A.I.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 2009No. C058506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

Juvenile courts are busy places with limited time to handle the many matters that come before them. In a commendable effort to help streamline the juvenile delinquency proceeding in this case, the minor’s trial attorney agreed that law enforcement witnesses need not testify twice, first at a hearing on the minor’s motion to suppress evidence, and then give essentially the same testimony at the jurisdictional hearing. If, after hearing those witnesses’ testimony, the court denied the suppression motion and the minor wanted to “continue” with a contested trial of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. Mario C.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. MARTHA C. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. Kenneth J.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. Usef S.California Court of Appeal · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Joshua S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. In re Jonathan A. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. In re M.B. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. In re M.P. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API