Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 12, 2004No. SC03-137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Bolden v. Moore, 865 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying a question to be of great public importance. Upon reflection and further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bolden v. FL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNeil v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Lewis v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. McNeil v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 2009