Crosby v. Bolden
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Bolden v. Moore, 865 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying a question to be of great public importance. Upon reflection and further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bolden v. FL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- McNeil v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Lewis v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- McNeil v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 2009