Legal Opinion

Allen v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 1948No. 33369PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At some time prior to December 4, 1946, plaintiffs Edna V. Palmer, Lester T. Palmer, T.E. Standley, Josef Faust and F.G. Kerns commenced an action in the district court of Okfuskee county, seeking, among other things, to cancel an oil and gas mining lease owned by defendants George C. Vincent and J.R. Allen. On December 4, 1946, the trial court rendered judgment in that case decreeing that the Vincent and Allen lease was a valid and subsisting lease, finding that during the litigation the primary term of the lease had expired, and gave Vincent and Allen a 30-day extension of said lease, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Chapman v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. French v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. DuncanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Eggleson v. McCaslandDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Cosden v. Carter Wolf Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API