A. B. Jac, Inc. v. Liquor Control Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceBrown, J.
My concurrence in the judgments herein is reluctant. It is impelled only by the reality that, in a former appeal of these cases to the Ohio Supreme Court involving at that time only a procedural question, based upon Justice Herbert’s concurring opinion, the Ohio Supreme Court appeared poised to review the merit issues and to conclude that' the liquor control commission had the lawful power and authority to suspend the appellee’s liquor permit, and properly did so, for reasons resembling or coinciding with the majority opinion herein. (See 29 Ohio St. 2d 139.)
The claimed specific, authority…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.