Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1963No. 40462PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Helen Mitchell (defendant below) from a decree of the lower court granting a divorce to both parties in an action brought by B. F. Mitchell (plaintiff below).

Plaintiff’s action for divorce was based on extreme cruelty, gross neglect of duty and incompatibility. Defendant’s answer and cross-petition alleged extreme cruelty, habitual drunkenness, nonsupport and incompatibility, because of which the parties were separated, and prayed that plaintiff be denied a divorce and that defendant be granted a decree of separate maintenance.

The evidence at the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Eisenreich v. EisenreichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Laster v. LasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Selby v. SelbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API