Legal Opinion

Castro v. City of Hanford

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 3, 2008No. CV-F-05-1405 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT COUNTY OF KINGS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

On February 1, 2008, defendant County of Kings filed a notice of motion for summary judgment or in the alternative, partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. On February 15, 2008, plaintiff Manuel Hernandez Castro filed his opposition to the motion. Defendant County filed its reply brief on February 25, 2008. The hearing set for March 3, 2008 was vacated and the matter was hereby submitted on the pleadings. See Local Rule…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlton v. Warden, London Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Sanchez-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  3. Sanchez-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API