Legal Opinion

De Mato v. County of Suffolk

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Scileppi, J.

This is an action for personal injuries arising out of an autoinobile ¡accident. The plaintiffs ’ car collided with a vehicle driven by defendant Howard Widmaier and owned by the defendant Kathleen Widmaier, who was apparently not ¡a participant in the accident. The defendant Kathleen Widmaier, in her answer, interposed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs for property damage to her automobile. The /plaintiffs, in their reply to the counterclaim, have asserted a “ cross claim ” against the defendant Howard Widmaier only, the driver of the car, for indemnification under the rationale of Dole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chambland v. BrewerNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meckley v. Hertz Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API