De Mato v. County of Suffolk
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Scileppi, J.
This is an action for personal injuries arising out of an autoinobile ¡accident. The plaintiffs ’ car collided with a vehicle driven by defendant Howard Widmaier and owned by the defendant Kathleen Widmaier, who was apparently not ¡a participant in the accident. The defendant Kathleen Widmaier, in her answer, interposed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs for property damage to her automobile. The /plaintiffs, in their reply to the counterclaim, have asserted a “ cross claim ” against the defendant Howard Widmaier only, the driver of the car, for indemnification under the rationale of Dole…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chambland v. BrewerNew York Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meckley v. Hertz Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1976