Legal Opinion
Meckley v. Hertz Corp.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided November 9, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelice K. Shea, J.
This is a motion by one defendant in a negligence action to strike the answer to its cross claim and the cross claim over of its codefendant on the ground that the pleading is no longer timely.
*606In the main action, plaintiffs allege personal injuries in the sum of $10,000 and property damage in the amount of $750 resulting from a collision between vehicles owned by the two defendants in the present motion. Defendant The Hertz Corporation (Hertz) served a copy of its answer to the complaint and a cross claim for indemnification and/or contribution on defendant Go-El Corporation (Go-El) on March…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Stein v. WhiteheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Lipson v. GewirtzNew York District Court · 1972
- Siskind v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- L. B. Foster Co. v. Terry Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of RaytownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Tisoncik v. SzczepankiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Balaban v. PhillipsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.