Legal Opinion
Elam v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 13, 2004No. 25869Published
1Opinion of the Court
361 S.C. 9 (2004)
602 S.E.2d 772
Hattie Rose ELAM, Respondent,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner.
No. 25869.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard November 19, 2003.
Decided September 13, 2004.
Pete Kulmala, of Harvey & Kulmala, of Barnwell, for Petitioner.
H. Woodrow Gooding, Jr. and Mark B. Tinsley, of Gooding and Gooding, of Allendale, for Respondent.
Justice BURNETT:
We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' unpublished order dismissing the appeal of the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) as untimely. Elam v. South…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Sears v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.