Legal Opinion

(PC) Richard v. Aldridge

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 4, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02006Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG RICHARD, No. 2:19-cv-2006 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 L. ALDRIDGE, Warden, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Craig Richard, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant is Warden L. Eldridge, sued as L. Aldridge. The parties have filed 20 cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 (ECF Nos. 72, 73.). For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API