Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Union Pac. R.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 19, 1950No. 28990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, Chief Judge.
This is an action to prevent, and secure damages for, unlawful discrimination under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Petitioner Hayes is a Negro member of the respondent Dining Car Employees Union Local 372 (hereinafter referred to as “Union”) and is employed by respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as “Railroad”) in its dining car and commissary service. He brings this action on behalf of himself and all other Negro employees similarly situated.
Respondents have filed certain motions to strike and have moved to dismiss the action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Terminal Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayes v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Alabaugh v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
- Air Line Dispatchers Ass'n v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Conley v. GibsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1955