Legal Opinion

Hitz v. Stouffer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeals, Nos. 276 and 277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

We have for consideration two separate trespass cases which were consolidated for trial. In the first case Marlin H. Hitz and Dolores X. Hitz instituted an action against Jean M. Stouffer for the recovery of property damages to the Hitz car. In the second case, Clair J. Stouffer and Jean M. Stouffer instituted an action against Paul E. Hershey, individually and trading as Hershey Brothers Garage, and James W. Pearson, for the recovery of property damages to the Stouffer car.

On the afternoon of June 27, 1961, a clear, dry day, Jean Stouffer was operating an automobile,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grande v. Wooleyhan Transport Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Freedman v. ZiccardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Merkel v. JaniszewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. D. M. Bare Paper Co. v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rhode v. KearneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API