Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Mayes County; Preston S. Davis. Judge. Action by Daniel W. Vann against the Hoard of County Commissioners of Mayes ■County, Okla. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
The case-made in this case fails to affirmatively show that the judgment from which plaintiff in error appeals was mitered upon the journal of the court. The case-made contains what appears to bo a decree of the court, to which is attached a stipulation of the attorneys for (he respective parties, agreeing that it is a true, correct, and exact copy of the decree, and that said decree was filed for record on the 10th day of September, 1915. It does not, however, appear where such decree was filed or that it was ever entered upon.the journal of the court. This being the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Schuck v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tarkenton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'n v. DavaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Malaski v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929