Legal Opinion

Malaski v. Farris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1923No. 14366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion iby

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in the superior court of Pottawatomie county, September 9, 1922, by defendant in error, plaintiff in lower court. Plaintiff alleged damages in the sum of $700 on account of certain actions and conduct on the part of the defendants, in that the defendants had forbidden this plaintiff to use a certain roadway.

The defendants answered by general denial, and further answering pleaded res ad-judícala, and filed counterclaim setting out various items of damage aggregating the sum of $700. When the case was called to trial and plaintiff offered evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mobley v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McBeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Hilligoss v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Illinois Bankers' Life Ass'n v. DavaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. McDonald v. BohlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Kenney v. NeumeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API