Legal Opinion
Deas v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 21, 1994No. S93A1335PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sears-Collins, Justice.
The issue on appeal is .whether there exists an easement across the property of Rutherford C. Deas and Donna B. Deas, the appellants (hereinafter “Deas”), in favor of Brent E. Hughes and Carolyn C. Hughes, the appellees (hereinafter “Hughes”). We find that the trial court erred in finding that such an easement exists, and, accordingly, we reverse.
L. J. Crumley once owned a tract of land which he subsequently divided into five contiguous parcels1 (for purposes of this opinion re*10ferred to as lots 1 through 5), each bordered by Lake Rabun on the west and a public road on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Calhoun v. OzburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Bruno v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elrod v. ElrodSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Khamis Enterprises, Inc. v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Hand v. PettittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Mersac, Inc. v. National Hills Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- DeNAPOLI Et Al v. OWEN Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.