Legal Opinion

Tedford v. Emison

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

Appellee, G. F. Emison, filed- this suit against the appellant, W. L. Tedford, in the Pulaski Chancery Court to cancel a deed from the State of Arkansas to the appellant based on a tax forfeiture of 1924, under act 129 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1929 to the east sixty feet of lot one in block twenty-five in North Argenta Addition to the city of North Little Eock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.

The appellee alleged that the deed was void because the act under which the State sold the land to appellant was unconstitutional, contrary to public policy, and creates unethical practices. He…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M'Clung v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Thomas v. SpiresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hilgers v. QuinneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Wildman v. EnfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hirsch and Schuman v. Dabbs and MivelazSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Wilkins v. MaggardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. McMillen v. East Arkansas Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Rayson v. BeckLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API