Legal Opinion
New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 7, 2005No. 03-CV-3243(TCP), 03-CV-3466(TCP)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants (“the Shinnecock Indian Nation” or “Shinnecock Indians” or “Shinne-cock Tribe”) have moved for Summary Judgment and the State of New York (“State”) and the Town of Southampton (“Town”) have moved for partial summary judgment in this consolidated action in which the State and its subdivision the Town seek to enjoin the Defendants from developing that part of their real property known as “Westwoods” (or “the Property”) with a casino open to the public.
This Court has heretofore written on plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Mashpee Tribe v. New Seabury Corp., Matthew B. Connolly, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. WeickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. Unkechuage NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. RellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Robinson v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.