Legal Opinion

(PC) Lovest v. Larosa

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01060Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTWONE LOVEST, No. 2:19-cv-1060-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The court screened plaintiff’s original complaint and found that he had stated a 19 cognizable retaliation claim against defendant LaRosa, but dismissed the remaining claims with 20 leave to amend. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which is before the court for screening 21 under 28…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API